Tanya O’Carroll v Meta; Landmark case to stop Facebook spying on us

Court asked to enforce unqualified “right to object” under GDPR
23 November 2022

Facebook owner Meta has been sued in  London’s High Court after claims that it disregarded the right to object against the collection of personal data to sell to advertisers.

Human rights advocate Tanya O’Carroll alleges that the Silicon Valley giant has breached UK data laws by failing to respect her right to demand that it stop collecting and processing her data.

The claim document includes an extensive list of “ad interests” that Meta had assigned to O’Carroll between 2021 and 2022, including sexuality and politics.

“This case is really about us all being able to connect with social media on our own terms,” O’Carroll told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme

The ultimate aim of the legal challenge is to push the company to offer an opt-out function to avoid data being passed on, enforcing the unqualified “right to object” under  UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

“We shouldn’t have to give up every detail of our personal lives just to connect with friends and family online. The law gives us the right to take back control over our personal data and stop Facebook surveilling and tracking us,” O’Carroll said in her statement.

Internet users have had the “right to object” since the GDPR was adopted in the UK in 2018. 

- CyberBeat

About CyberBeat

CyberBeat is a grassroots initiative from a team of producers and subject matter experts, driven out of frustration at the lack of media coverage, responding to an urgent need to provide a clear, concise, informative and educational approach to the growing fields of Cybersecurity and Digital Privacy.

Contact CyberBeat

If you have a story of interest, a comment, a concern or if you'd just like to say Hi, please contact us

Terms & Policies >>


We couldn't do this without the support of our sponsors and contributors.